tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post5856133098623289023..comments2023-11-06T11:31:25.673-08:00Comments on Activist Teacher: On the gargantuan lie of climate change scienceDenis Rancourthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16743375141824505606noreply@blogger.comBlogger28125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-44523205489269311602016-11-20T08:37:23.401-08:002016-11-20T08:37:23.401-08:00@Anonymous: Yup.
And see:
http://dissidentvoice...@Anonymous: Yup.<br /><br />And see: <br /><br /><a href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2016/10/the-co2-god-controls-environmental-disasters-not/" rel="nofollow">http://dissidentvoice.org/2016/10/the-co2-god-controls-environmental-disasters-not/</a><br /><br />Denis Rancourthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17895449135200826970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-71356476300432808362016-11-20T01:10:53.267-08:002016-11-20T01:10:53.267-08:00So basically, we're still in the same position...So basically, we're still in the same position of those who prayed to the gods when bad weather struck.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-37302438446706610512015-09-01T07:11:56.793-07:002015-09-01T07:11:56.793-07:00@Adam T: Sorry, there is nothing of merit worth re...@Adam T: Sorry, there is nothing of merit worth responding to in your comment, as I see it. However, I will continue to read comments and papers in my own on-going effort to find any errors in my work, and to adjust and correct as needed.Denis Rancourthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16743375141824505606noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-27131876252978241392015-09-01T06:37:40.190-07:002015-09-01T06:37:40.190-07:00I don't know if the author is still reading th...I don't know if the author is still reading this or not, but it seems even physicists (or at least this one physicist) can be innumerate. <br /><br />"Again regarding rates, the present (2010) historic maximum of anthropogenic (caused by humans) fossil fuel burning is only 8% or so of global primary production (GPP) (both expressed as kilograms of carbon per year, kg-C/y) [7]. GPP is theAdam Thttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05732634930200886666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-68604007046972844752011-10-05T11:18:58.198-07:002011-10-05T11:18:58.198-07:00Funny stuff, Denis. If I didn't know there was...Funny stuff, Denis. If I didn't know there was an entire literature on the carbon cycle developed over the past 30+ years I might be moved. You and Prof Salby could cut and paste together, save time plus increase the number and magnitude of your mistakes.Jay Althttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11146408415375034447noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-19362387367509140482011-04-24T15:54:54.878-07:002011-04-24T15:54:54.878-07:00Help! I'm trying to figure out what the claime...Help! I'm trying to figure out what the claimed "greenhouse" effect is and how it might be experimentally tested, since as far as I can find, it has not been properly described and has not been experimentally tested.<br /><br />So are climate scientists claiming that there is some mix of gases that can modify heat transfer between two bodies? Surely one could propose a lab blouis79https://www.blogger.com/profile/13769400459008203001noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-69482519476374934302011-04-23T17:00:29.181-07:002011-04-23T17:00:29.181-07:00Scientists are happy to debate issues and have no ...Scientists are happy to debate issues and have no need to attack individuals as politicians love to do.blouis79https://www.blogger.com/profile/13769400459008203001noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-90776500228196186992011-04-21T21:11:13.165-07:002011-04-21T21:11:13.165-07:00Your literature search is shallow and incredibly u...Your literature search is shallow and incredibly unbalanced. Unfortunately your introduction oozes the talking points of the corporate funded astro turfers which leeches credibility from your subsequent discussion. Quoting blogs is exceptionally poor form. Quoting your own blog is lower than intellectual masturbation.<br /><br />A warning to others, this is not the place to get valid information.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-20206568865281808152011-04-20T17:51:52.548-07:002011-04-20T17:51:52.548-07:00Why do climate scientists ignore the basic physics...Why do climate scientists ignore the basic physics of heat, mass and temperature? I have looked and found the physics basis of climatology temperature prediction fanciful.<br /><br />It is 100% guaranteed that turning any source of potential energy (chemical, nuclear) on earth to heat will cause a rise in temperature. Bo Nordell has analyzed this and claims to account for about 3/4 of the blouis79https://www.blogger.com/profile/13769400459008203001noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-25551069313741376192011-04-19T19:18:43.667-07:002011-04-19T19:18:43.667-07:00When all the AGW hoaxers die
We will raise a monum...When all the AGW hoaxers die<br />We will raise a monument into the sky<br />A monument of solid Carbon<br />To commemorate their Bogus Bargain.Maurice Jnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-83186785567267838722011-04-13T10:33:09.179-07:002011-04-13T10:33:09.179-07:00Terrific accounting of the CAGW hoax, nice job.Terrific accounting of the CAGW hoax, nice job.codeheadnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-11885143714785712192011-03-28T13:15:21.628-07:002011-03-28T13:15:21.628-07:00Here are more prepared responses from the believer...Here are more prepared responses from the believer site RealClimate:<br /><br />http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/index/#Responses<br /> <br />Each intetrested person must judge for themselves: "But is it true?" by Aaron Wildavsky.Denis Rancourthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16743375141824505606noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-82548367219299745202011-03-28T12:51:31.320-07:002011-03-28T12:51:31.320-07:00Denis Rancourt - is it ignorance or deceit that ma...Denis Rancourt - is it ignorance or deceit that makes you completely irrelevant?<br />Your delusions of adequacy and competence have been comprehensively answered at http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php, and elsewhere.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-33209784966886475892011-03-23T12:07:14.004-07:002011-03-23T12:07:14.004-07:00By the way, a very good and informative piece.By the way, a very good and informative piece.JLinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07362370747511170229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-90079814045255489652011-03-23T12:04:55.694-07:002011-03-23T12:04:55.694-07:00"Never mind that the whole climate change sca..."Never mind that the whole climate change scam is now driven by the top-level financiers newly eyeing a multi-trillion-dollar paper economy ..."<br /><br />Opportunists are opportunists. If government Statists are the sharks, then the "financiers" are the remoras. The initial scam was in politically motivated scientists creating the false crisis and being abbetted by the JLinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07362370747511170229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-26590869541685975962011-03-23T03:23:01.106-07:002011-03-23T03:23:01.106-07:00Again heat loss is expressed as radiation where in...Again heat loss is expressed as radiation where in fact heat is lost from the surface by convection and heat exchanged within the atmosphere by conduction between the so called GHG's and the basic constituents of the atmosphere oxygen and nitrogen. To comply with the laws of thermodynamics heat can only flow, by whatever means, from hot to cold so the warm convecting gasses, which will cool John Marshallnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-82240130104475059232011-03-22T17:30:21.654-07:002011-03-22T17:30:21.654-07:00Hi Inferno,
Here is a response to your points.
(...Hi Inferno,<br /><br />Here is a response to your points.<br /><br />(1) I did not intend to suggest that the the observed increase in atmospheric CO2 is unrelated to industrialization and human population growth. For example, the large land use changes that have occurred could modify (have modified) the net fluxes between planetary carbon reservoirs.<br /><br />In this way, the CO2 increase Denis Rancourthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16743375141824505606noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-70526338391997251162011-03-22T16:48:23.665-07:002011-03-22T16:48:23.665-07:00If the recent CO2 rise was natural then nature has...If the recent CO2 rise was natural then nature has chosen a really weird time to kick CO2 up to 650,000+ year highs...<br /><br />"But the post-industrial CO2 in the atmosphere is half of the amount that would have resulted from the industrial burning"<br /><br />Meaning human emissions can more than account for the rise in CO2 that has led to levels reaching 650,000+ year highs.<br /><Infernohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13782237962383950682noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-51517476689369749682011-03-22T14:17:27.262-07:002011-03-22T14:17:27.262-07:00Good points. For more on it, perhaps more underst...Good points. For more on it, perhaps more understandable by the climate science layman see my google.doc:<br /><br />https://docs.google.com/a/ablesfamily.com/View?id=ddrj9jjs_0fsv8n9gw&pli=1Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-37196550865973390652011-03-22T13:52:54.946-07:002011-03-22T13:52:54.946-07:00Kudos to Professor Rancourt for a cogent debunking...Kudos to Professor Rancourt for a cogent debunking of the the CO2 Climate Warming "New Age" Religion. Politicians & Grant-seeking Pseudo-scientists have attempted to present this as "Settled Science". <br /><br />True Science is NOT a consensus poll. Sometimes, those scientists that do not toe the conventional wisdom of their day are outcasts such as Copernicus and JONsagerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11079030510405625019noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-88841697882499794932011-03-22T13:24:43.774-07:002011-03-22T13:24:43.774-07:00This is a really outstanding and informative artic...This is a really outstanding and informative article. <br /><br />It inspires one to ask questions of Wolfram Alpha, such as "What is the surface area of the Earth" and to develop some hard (e.g. real) numbers about atmospheric CO2 densities and whether the alleged "danger" is plausible or not. (I have concluded "Not.")<br /><br />Also thanks so much for showing how Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-31504879873988267412011-03-22T12:31:38.769-07:002011-03-22T12:31:38.769-07:00In the UK we use the mechanism of the Renewable Ob...In the UK we use the mechanism of the <a href="http://nodeinthenoosphere.blogspot.com/2009/05/roc-wealth-transfer-mechanism.html" rel="nofollow">Renewable Obligation Certificate</a>, behind a smokescreen of environmentalism, in order to transfer wealth from poor to rich.gyg3shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08295092807711672726noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-64443077834886521662011-03-22T12:00:07.947-07:002011-03-22T12:00:07.947-07:00The whole CO2 scam is based on speculation, exagge...The whole CO2 scam is based on speculation, exaggeration and scare tactics put forth by those who will benefit financially .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-8916156942137638212011-03-22T11:58:55.514-07:002011-03-22T11:58:55.514-07:00Good article. A little too complicated for me to ...Good article. A little too complicated for me to understand as a lot of the terminology I didn't understand.<br /><br />I'm currently on the side that global warming IS happening but am very open to both sides of the story.<br /><br />You stated that the amount of fossil fuel CO2 produced is about equal to the amount of CO2 produced from animals breathing. Does this not mean that CO2 Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16027063326109206685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-418581095311857454.post-36113878448429421392011-03-22T11:48:05.443-07:002011-03-22T11:48:05.443-07:00Climate Depot calls you "left-wing", for...Climate Depot calls you "left-wing", for a lefty you are pretty damn smart!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com