The Real News Network's coverage of climategate was pathetic (readers of the present blog know our views on climategate - we told you so... LINK-1, LINK-2). However, the Network's reports on Latin America and on the Israel-Palestine conflict are often outstanding (HERE and HERE).
And generally, The Real News Network's coverage/commentary about economic questions is lost in left theory and not exactly bold. But recently, the Network has featured star analyst and renown whistleblower William K. Black and that just makes up for so much mush...
And at least three more video interviews like this that must be watched: PART-2, PART-3, PART-4. Black is brilliant in speaking truth to whoever will listen - and its a big truth.
And the mystery is: Why hasn't Bill Black been killed?
Here is my proposed answer and an alternative answer.
Because (1) he's not having any real impact on public opinion, thanks to media blackout; (2) he's nonetheless known and in the public eye, as an accomplished author and commentator; (3) looks bad when you start killing university professors; and (4) if you go after him viciously it could backfire and further expose those that want him dead.
Alternatively, they did kill Black dead: He's now just a small town university professor. Probably grades his students fairly. Far away from any government regulatory agency where he would be desperately needed...
Too many left intellectuals and progressive types have ridiculed or avoided the 911 Truth Movement so now I must embed this video.
Too many left analysts have used 911 to support their favorite theories about US foreign policy and blowback and the like and to support their wistful hopes that backlash might slow the Empire's killing machine and so on so now I am compelled to embed this video.
Iceland is a magical place where they have some democracy. A place where citizens can use referendums to kill government national economic plans.
Just recently 94% of Icelanders rejected the government's deal to repay the national debt, forcing the politicos to negotiate a better deal or die.
What is it with this idea to mortgage present and future generations of a nation to pay back some contrived debt arising more from colluding politicians and financial slight of hand than anything else?
The entire capitalist justification for interest on a loan is that lending costs money because some borrowers default. Interest is a risk benefit. It's not capitalism if you remove the risk by not allowing defaults - it's extortion.
It's extortion when financiers lend beyond the capacity of the borrower, at interest rates set by the lender, and then force an entire citizenry and their unborn children to pay back.
And what happens if you default? You loose access to foreign investment capital. You loose access to more financial exploitation... That doesn't sound so bad, especially when you know that the nation's real wealth is its people and its resources.
The entire money as debt scam needs to be taught in primary school and rejected outright.
In Iceland citizens are setting the terms. They've had it with a hen house managed by the fox. The sign says "Power To The People" and they mean it.
Go Iceland! Put your politicians in check. Throw the banks out to the sea. The land belongs to she who works it.
Iceland also feels rather strongly about transparency. Icelanders don't buy this corporate and government secrets crap (see Corbett Report video below).
You cannot get the media to critique the financiers that own the media but consider the alternative media... The full spectrum of alternative media, as a start to something that at least reflects reality.
Just two examples... to critique and think about...
Members of College and University Workers United (CUWU) have sent a strong open letter of protest to the University of Ottawa's President Allan Rock.
"We, the undersigned members of College and University Workers United (CUWU), know Dr Denis Rancourt to be a dedicated educator and a fearless defender of justice. We know Denis Rancourt to stand for human rights and students' rights. We are thankful to count Denis Rancourt among the rare public intellectuals who do not compromise their principles when they become aware of institutional folly; but instead use their positions to expose and correct flawed practices.
[...]
We conclude that the charges advanced against Denis Rancourt are a contrived pretext, that they are preposterous as reasons to summarily remove a tenured professor, and that, therefore, the real reasons must lie elsewhere. We conclude that this was a political firing to remove a dissident academic who was also critical of the university administration and supportive of student efforts to reform the institution towards greater student power. "