Wide-ranging interview of Denis Rancourt on Nader's Show

"Call the Zionists what they are: Nazi criminals" -- Auschwitz survivor

Auschwitz survivor, Dutch theoretical physicist and human rights activist HAJO MEYER (died at 90 in 2014, both his parents were killed at Auschwitz):

<< “If we want to stay really human beings, we must get up and call the Zionists what they are: Nazi criminals,” Meyer said. The hate of the Jews by the Germans “was less deeply rooted than the hate of the Palestinians by the Israeli Jews,” he observed. “The brainwashing of the Jewish Israeli populations is going on for over sixty years. They cannot see a Palestinian as a human being.”

While discussing Europe’s response to Israel’s policies, Hajo said that Europe should respond with “a much more large scale boycott of Israel” than a ban on settlement products. If we Europeans pretend to hold high the flag of humanity with what is happening in Gaza, Israel should be outcasted by us.”

I asked him if he had a message for the Palestinians, Israelis or human rights activists.

“My message for the Palestinians is that they should not give up their fight,” he replied. “If they give up, they might lose their self-esteem with the ongoing humiliations by the Israeli Nazis. Fight with human means. It is justified to show to the Israeli Zionists that you are a force to reckon with. Fight with stones, with weapons. Yes, also with weapons. If you don’t fight, you lose your self-esteem and will not be respected by the Israelis.”

“If we Western democratic societies don’t support the Palestinians in their fight, we must feel ashamed if the Palestinians are annihilated. The US and the European Union must show their teeth,” he added. >> --LINK

And this from the heavily-Israel-lobby-patrolled Wikipedia:

<< Meyer became politically active, including as director of A Different Jewish Voice. He wrote Het einde van het Jodendom (The End of Judaism) in 2003, which accuses Israel of abusing the Holocaust to justify crimes against the Palestinians. He was a member of the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network. He participated in the 2011 "Never Again – For Anyone" tour. He claimed Zionism predates fascism, that Zionists and fascists had a history of cooperation (Nazi/Zionist cooperation was the subject of 51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis, which was collected and edited by Lenni Brenner), charging, among other things, that Israel wants to foment anti-Semitism in the world to encourage more Jews to migrate to Israel.[4]

Meyer spoke in favor of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions against Israel.[5] Meyer was a member of the Dutch GreenLeft. >>

And directly from interview:

<< Now the world is silent while the Jews, or- the Israelis- harass, humiliate and steal away land from the Palestinians. And the world is silent, and I want to awake the world, because any criticism on the policies of Israel, is hampered and made impossible by a terrible trick and crime of Israeli propaganda, that any criticism on the politics of Israel comes out and is induced by anti-Semitic feelings. >> --LINK

Can the principle of freedom of expression be used in propaganda that supports censorship?

Stephen Pollard

By Denis Rancourt, PhD

Yes it can. Here is a good example.

In this article, "[a]s editor of the country’s leading Jewish newspaper, The Jewish Chronicle," Stephen Pollard, pays lip service to freedom of expression by being critical of “snowflakes”.

Snowflakes are not the state. Snowflakes do not use lethal violence to silence dissidents and political participation in the affairs of global and regional state aggressors. Rather, snowflakes are a social phenomenon that results from decades of evisceration of the state educational system by design, away from independent thought and towards emotional malleability.

The snowflake culture is nurtured by an exploitative political class, and that relation can lead the state to pass laws that degrade freedom of expression, especially when the repressive laws also prevent political challenge to the (for now) dominant correctness constituency.

In presenting snowflakes as the nexus of suppression of speech, Pollard achieves two primary propaganda goals:

1. He opens with the pervasively promoted Israel-lobby meme and political device that The Holocaust is a “unique evil”, as though this were a given law of nature. Actually, “The Holocaust” is not a unique evil and is extensively used in propaganda and extortion schemes, as conclusively established in Professor Norman Finkelstein’s landmark 2000 book “The Holocaust Industry”.

2. He covers up by omission and substitution the Israel-lobby-driven current aggressive state attacks against freedom of expression and political participation rights: criminalization of criticism of the very state of Israel, cast as anti-Semitic “hate speech”; criminalization of so-called Holocaust denial (any questioning of historical events surrounding the Nazi holocaust); and statutory civil liability for supporting the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) civil-society campaign against Israeli occupation (e.g.).

Mission accomplished.

So, while many Western states are prosecuting and jailing ordinary citizens for their beliefs and expression, as “hate speech” or as civil campaigns allegedly motivated by anti-Semitism, in Canada, France, Germany, the USA… Pollard invites us to have an emotional reaction against “snowflakes” because snowflakes are silly.  In doing so, he quotes Orwell.

Snowflakes don’t scare me. They will be offended and insulted back into reality if and when reality imposes itself. State laws and state militarism to dominate domestic and foreign populations on the other hand are precisely the instruments that lead to “unique evils”.

The X-PHOBIA CATASTROPHE must be reversed

Opinion  /  Denis Rancourt


Beyond a simple political-correctness meltdown, North American society is in the midst of an X-phobia catastrophe.


North America is following a RECIPE FOR SOCIETAL DISASTER: Let governments, institutions, and special-interest lobbies make the definitions of racism, antisemitism, misogyny, X-phobia... as broad as possible and then prosecute everyone for expressed-opinion and inferred-belief violations and sentence them to economic and social exclusion in as many areas of activity as possible.


SOLUTION: Actual freedom of expression with strong protections against the punishing governments, institutions, and special-interest lobbies.

Racism of personal opinion is not a crime. Inferred individual character inadequacies must not be punished by governments and their enabled institutions and corporations.

Instead, concentrate on the physical racism-etc of governments and their enabled institutions and corporations, such as war, genocide, economic apartheid, class-based persecution... Work for more actual democracy, not more societal exclusion and apartheids.

ISRAEL: The whole "criticism of Israel is antisemitism" circus is a textbook example of how a powerful, stratified, funded, organized special-interest lobby (Israel lobby, promoting Israel as the main Middle East foreign-policy enforcer of the USA-allied system) generates propriety crimes to be used against political organizers (BDS) and opinion leaders.

Here in Canada, Ryerson University... [1]


Endnote

[1] "Ryerson University Defines Anti-Semitism", By Ali Rosenblatt, The Louis D. Brandeis Centre, 2017-08-02, http://brandeiscenter.com/blog/ryerson-university-defines-anti-semitism/

Whether Trump or Obama: AIPAC houses (Congress, Senate) must be reined in

Opinion  /  Denis Rancourt

In the face of the reality of emerging Eurasia, seen on every front including the Middle East, the USA has two nonexclusive options:

1. Act in a reasonable and responsible manner to avoid the next conflicts that could accelerate its downfall, or 
2. Push ambitious civil-unrest and military campaigns for perceived regional gains or to satisfy rogue allies such as Israel. 

Nice to see option-1 showing the top of its bald head every once in a while [1].

This had to happen: war with Iran would be a gamble that could end USA dominance in the Middle East.

The big boys of the real deep state needed to show themselves and clear out some of the Israel ideologues and war mongers.

The AIPAC houses (Congress, Senate) need to be reined in or the whole hegemony thing could seriously go to hell.


Endnote

[1] "McMaster solidifies power at NSC — and supports Iran deal, sees Israel as occupier", By Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss, 2017-08-05, http://mondoweiss.net/2017/08/mcmaster-solidifies-supports/
 

WAR WITH IRAN - TRUMP INSANITY

Trump is turning out to be a dangerous clown, one that has been a gift for climate and political-correctness critics, but a dangerous clown nonetheless.

The USA is truly frightening, no matter which clown it puts in the window. But the shift towards a more loving USA embrace of Saudi and Israel may well be a preparation for war against Iran, under the pretext of fighting terrorism. Meanwhile, ISIS is a USA creation funded by Saudi, aided by Israel, fought by Iran!

Israel wants a coalition war against Iran more than anything, and Clinton had promised it. Trump was elected to make American great at home... Now he may go along with the most murderous plan of all?

The prospect of war with Iran under Trump, is not just more clowning. It is the most horrific "next step" imaginable. Trump can't show that box of candy and then simply put it away on a high shelf without a real political fight. There is no evidence that Trump could mount or win such a political fight against the deep state and Israeli influence.

A war with Iran would be Trump's legacy of maniacal criminality. If he is using that prospect to leverage the creation of a Palestinian pseudo-state, then he is truly a nutcase. God help us.

US “sue Saudis for 911 law” would be a geopolitical tectonic shift because…

New law approved by Congress on September 9 violates international law, would destabilize the US regime

By Denis G. Rancourt

We live in particularly unstable and dangerous times. The US behemoth is forced to adjust to an increasingly multipolar world, as Eurasia and alliances such as BRICS coalesce.

The coup in Brazil, tripling US expenditures for suppression in Latin America, Israel’s frantic genocidal pace, the NATO build up to intimidate Russia, Syria’s miracle resistance against US-desired “regime change”, Trump’s nationalistic impulses, and a Philippine president’s angry words… are all signs of the changing world.

The US regime did not need a domestic crisis that threatens its geopolitical posture, but it certainly deserves one.

I don’t mean pipeline resistance or Black Lives Matter. Those can be bulldozed and bought out without much difficulty. And the occupying police gang is not about to be displaced by any rival. No, I mean the “sue Saudis for 911 law” crisis: a real shit-could-hit-the-fan doozy.

Let me explain. For this, I need to present the following elements: Relevant international law concepts, present US law that violates the state immunity principle, characteristics of the new “sue Saudis for 911 law”, and the three reasons that this lawmakers’ project is a threat to the US regime.

Will York University in Toronto go along with this latest attack by organized groups?

York U staffer under investigation for anti-Semitic posts

Toronto police investigate teacher’s comments at Al-Quds Day rally

I am very concerned by these and all such select attacks against employees, especially in the education sector, based on an employee's expression outside of work.

I have reviewed the posts of Nikolaos Balaskas, which are the pretext for this particular attack, and the posts are harmless. The posts are also buried in the distant FB Timeline and are thus difficult to access. If The Canadian Jewish News was truthful about its pretense of harm, then it would not repeat and amplify the said posts on its website. Its article appears to be boasting about the influence that can get an employee "investigated" and possibly fired.

Such attacks as this one, IMO, are strategic attacks to create a continuous propaganda that would give the false impression that antisemitism is a larger-than-reality and growing societal problem. Clearly, this and other such campaigns are (expressly) driven by influential organizations that have the agenda of defending Israeli Middle East policies in the Canadian public opinion and among Canadian lawmakers.

Very disturbing violations of civil rights and freedoms. Will York University go along with this?

Left Analysts: Clinton Presidency Would Be More Criminal and Murderous Than Anything Trump

Many left analysts from all sectors predict that a Clinton presidency would mean savage wars like nothing nationalist Trump would do.

Trump “the Fascist”: Backdoor Backing of a Political Psychopath Named Hilary Clinton
April 12th, 2016
James Petras

Want Endless War? Love the U.S. Empire? Clinton’s Your Choice
February 3, 2016
Marjorie Cohn

Trump and Clinton: Censoring the unpalatable
March 29, 2016
John Pilger

Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III
March 10, 2016
Maidhc Ó Cathail and Diana Johnstone

Exposed: The US is an Oligarchy Ruled by Billionaires and Dictators
April 17, 2016
Vanessa Beeley

We came, we saw, he died
February 2015
Jackson Lears

Hillary Clinton, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Establishment
February 24, 2016
Matt Peppe

Keeping the Arabs Divided --Gowans blog

From The Bannerman Report, written in 1907 by British prime minister Henry Campbell Bannerman:

“There are people (the Arabs, Editor’s Note) who control spacious territories teeming with manifest and hidden resources. They dominate the intersections of world routes. Their lands were the cradles of human civilizations and religions. These people have one faith, one language, one history and the same aspirations. No natural barriers can isolate these people from one another … if, per chance, this nation were to be unified into one state, it would then take the fate of the world into its hands and would separate Europe from the rest of the world. Taking these considerations seriously, a foreign body should be planted in the heart of this nation to prevent the convergence of its wings in such a way that it could exhaust its powers in never-ending wars. It could also serve as a springboard for the West to gain its coveted objects.”

[Dan Bar-On & Sami Adwan, THE PRIME SHARED HISTORY PROJECT, in Educating Toward a Culture of Peace, pages 309–323, Information Age Publishing, 2006]

Cited by Tariq Ali in “Blinded by Israel, Visionless in Gaza,” Counterpunch, July 23, 2014

what's left (Gowans blog), July 23, 2014

A response by McGill Professors to Principal Suzanne Fortier’s condemnation of BDS

A response by McGill Professors to Principal Suzanne Fortier’s condemnation of BDS

As McGill professors committed to justice and equity, we strongly disagree with Principal Suzanne Fortier’s official response on behalf of the university administration to the recent Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) motion in support of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel and the subsequent on-line process which failed to ratify this vote. Her email response, sent to all McGill students and faculty, came moments after the results of the on-line process were announced, and echoed the disappointing and ill-informed motion passed by the Canadian Parliament in condemning the growing BDS movement.  For Principal Fortier to denounce a movement defending the rights of Palestinians against those who are oppressing them is in fact what “flies in the face of tolerance and respect"—not the BDS movement itself. The call for BDS, drawing upon lessons learned from earlier international movements against apartheid South Africa, indeed urges universities to end institutional ties with institutions funded and sponsored by the Israeli state, and which are complicit in the Occupation and violations of international law. The BDS movement is a measured, non-violent and principled civil society response to life under occupation and colonialism when a people’s basic rights are violated and denied.

The BDS call demands “tolerance and respect” for Palestinians--something that they have been denied by the state of Israel. It is precisely because Palestinians are not afforded the same rights as other peoples that BDS is necessary. Palestinians do not have equal rights to education, and are regularly denied their academic freedom. But they are also denied freedom of movement, freedom of association, and even their lives. "Freedom, equity, inclusiveness and the exchange of views and ideas in responsible, open discourse”, which are the core principles of McGill University as stated by Suzanne Fortier, are precisely what Palestinians are asking for with this call.

If these core principles do indeed guide the McGill community, it is our responsibility to support a grassroots movement initiated by the vast majority of Palestinian civil society. The demands of the BDS movement are simple. Israel should comply with international law by: (1) ending its occupation and colonization of Arab lands and dismantling the Wall; (2) recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and (3) respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194. When Israel complies with international law in these ways, there will be no more need for BDS.

Our mission as educators is to advance learning, to create and disseminate knowledge by offering our students the best possible education. We believe that upholding the highest international standards in teaching, research and scholarship, as well as service to local and international communities, means standing up for what is right when called upon to do so--locally, by supporting students who are working for justice for Palestine, and internationally, by responding to the call made by Palestinian civil society.

While we respect the freedom of expression of all members of our community, including the right of Principal Suzanne Fortier to publicly condemn the BDS movement, we resolve to steadfastly continue to support BDS and the work of our students at McGill who will carry on and continue to build this struggle.  In this case, the McGill administration, like the Canadian government, is on the wrong side of history.  The Canadian Parliament’s motion on BDS does not act in our name. As McGill professors, we also declare now and will continue to state that if this is the McGill Administration’s response to the BDS movement, it also does not act in our name.

Signed,

Malek Abisaab, Associate Professor, Department of History and Classical Studies

Rula Jurdi Abisaab, Associate Professor, Institute of Islamic Studies

Diana Allan, Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology and the Institute for the Study of International Development

Alia Al-Saji, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy

Isabelle Arseneau, professeure agrégée, département de langue et littérature françaises

Jodie Beck, Course Lecturer, Department of East Asian Studies

Arnaud Bernadet, professeur agrégé, département de langue et littérature françaises

Lara Braitstein, Associate Professor, Faculty of Religious Studies

Brian Bergstrom, Visiting Professor, Department of East Asian Studies

Curtis Brown, Faculty Lecturer, Department of English

Mary Bunch, Faculty Lecturer, Institute for Gender, Sexuality, and Feminist Studies

Michelle Cho, Korea Foundation Assistant Professor, Department of East Asian Studies

Aziz Choudry, Associate Professor and Canada Research Chair in Social Movement Learning and Knowledge Production, Department of Integrated Studies in Education

Barry Eidlin,  Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology

Shanon Fitzpatrick, Assistant Professor, Department of History and Classical Studies

Allan Greer, Professor and Canada Research Chair in Colonial North America,
Department of History and Classical Studies

Jill Hanley, Associate Professor, McGill School of Social Work

Michelle Hartman, Associate Professor, Institute of Islamic Studies

Adrienne Hurley, Associate Professor, Department of East Asian Studies

Ahmed F. Ibrahim, Assistant Professor, Institute of Islamic Studies

Steven Jordan, Associate Professor, Department of Integrated Studies in Education

Pasha M. Khan, Assistant Professor, Institute of Islamic Studies

Thomas Lamarre, James McGill Professor in East Asian Studies and Associate in Communications Studies

Catherine Leclerc, professeure agrégée, département de langue et littérature françaises

Andrée Lévesque, Professor Emerita, History Department

Abby Lippman, Professor Emerita - Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health

Margaret Lock, Marjorie Bronfman Professor Emerita, Department of Social Studies of Medicine

Laura Madokoro, Assistant Professor, Department of History and Classical Studies

Setrag Manoukian, Associate Professor, Institute of Islamic Studies and Department of Anthropology

Gregory M. Mikkelson, Associate professor, Department of Philosophy

Charmaine A. Nelson, Associate Professor of Art History, Department of Art History and Communication Studies

Naomi Nichols, Assistant Professor, Department of Integrated Studies in Education

Máire Noonan, Course Lecturer & Research Assistant, Department of Linguistics

Kristin Norget, Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology

Anthony Paré, Professor Emeritus, Department of Integrated Studies in Education

Laila Parsons, Associate Professor, Department of History and Classical Studies

Jarrett Rudy, Associate Professor, Department of History and Classical Studies

Jessica Ruglis, Assistant Professor, Department of Educational & Counselling Psychology

Mela Sarkar, Associate Professor, Department of Integrated Studies in Education

Richard Shearmur, Professor, McGill School of Urban Planning

Jon Soske, Assistant Professor, Department of History and Classical Studies

Maria Theresia Starzmann, Assistant Professor, Anthropology Department

Gavin Walker, Assistant Professor, History & Classical Studies and East Asian Studies

Robert Wisnovsky, Professor and James McGill Chair, Institute of Islamic Studies

Brian J. Young, Professor Emeritus, Department of History 

Canadian Members of Parliament Vote in Express Contempt for Democracy, in Support of Israel's Apartheid Regime

On February 22, 2016, 68% of the federal members of parliament in Canada's House of Commons voted FOR this motion:

That, given Canada and Israel share a long history of friendship as well as economic and diplomatic relations, the House reject the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which promotes the demonization and delegitimization of the State of Israel, and call upon the government to condemn any and all attempts by Canadian organizations, groups or individuals to promote the BDS movement, both here at home and abroad.

It does not appear to have crossed their minds that they were thereby subverting the freedom of political participation, democracy, and Canada's constitution. (Although a few were visibly tormented: VIDEO.)

This was a truly historic vote. And we must never forget how "our" representatives voted (or did not vote):

A = absent or abstained  /  NO = voted against the motion  /  * = voted for the motion

VOTE	First Name	Last Name	Political Affiliation
*	Ziad	Aboultaif	Conservative
*	Dan	Albas	Conservative
*	Harold	Albrecht	Conservative
*	John	Aldag	Liberal
A	Omar	Alghabra	Liberal
A	Leona	Alleslev	Liberal
*	Dean	Allison	Conservative
*	Rona	Ambrose	Conservative
*	William	Amos	Liberal
A	Gary	Anandasangaree	Liberal
*	David	Anderson	Conservative
NO	Charlie	Angus	NDP
*	Mel	Arnold	Conservative
NO	René	Arseneault	Liberal
A	Chandra	Arya	Liberal
NO	Niki	Ashton	NDP
NO	Robert	Aubin	NDP
*	Ramez	Ayoub	Liberal
A	Vance	Badawey	Liberal
NO	Larry	Bagnell	Liberal
*	Navdeep	Bains	Liberal
*	John	Barlow	Conservative
A	Xavier	Barsalou-Duval	Bloc Québécois
*	Frank	Baylis	Liberal
A	Mario	Beaulieu	Bloc Québécois
*	Terry	Beech	Liberal
A	Mauril	Bélanger	Liberal
*	Carolyn	Bennett	Liberal
NO	Sheri	Benson	NDP
*	Candice	Bergen	Conservative
*	Maxime	Bernier	Conservative
*	Luc	Berthold	Conservative
*	James	Bezan	Conservative
*	Marie-Claude	Bibeau	Liberal
*	Chris	Bittle	Liberal
NO	Daniel	Blaikie	NDP
*	Bill	Blair	Liberal
NO	Rachel	Blaney	NDP
*	Steven	Blaney	Conservative
*	Kelly	Block	Conservative
*	Randy	Boissonnault	Liberal
*	Mike	Bossio	Liberal
A	Sylvie	Boucher	Conservative
NO	Michel	Boudrias	Bloc Québécois
NO	Alexandre	Boulerice	NDP
NO	Marjolaine	Boutin-Sweet	NDP
*	John	Brassard	Conservative
A	Bob	Bratina	Liberal
*	Pierre	Breton	Liberal
*	Scott	Brison	Liberal
NO	Ruth Ellen	Brosseau	NDP
*	Gordon	Brown	Conservative
*	Celina	Caesar-Chavannes	Liberal
*	Blaine	Calkins	Conservative
NO	Richard	Cannings	NDP
NO	Guy	Caron	NDP
*	Jim	Carr	Liberal
*	Colin	Carrie	Conservative
*	Bill	Casey	Liberal
*	Sean	Casey	Liberal
*	Bardish	Chagger	Liberal
*	François-Philippe	Champagne	Liberal
A	Arnold	Chan	Liberal
A	Shaun	Chen	Liberal
*	Michael	Chong	Conservative
NO	François	Choquette	NDP
NO	David	Christopherson	NDP
*	Alupa	Clarke	Conservative
*	Tony	Clement	Conservative
*	Michael	Cooper	Conservative
*	Serge	Cormier	Liberal
NO	Nathan	Cullen	NDP
*	Rodger	Cuzner	Liberal
*	Julie	Dabrusin	Liberal
A	Pam	Damoff	Liberal
A	Don	Davies	NDP
*	Matt	DeCourcey	Liberal
*	Gérard	Deltell	Conservative
*	Sukh	Dhaliwal	Liberal
*	Anju	Dhillon	Liberal
*	Nicola	Di Iorio	Liberal
A	Stéphane	Dion	Liberal
*	Kerry	Diotte	Conservative
*	Todd	Doherty	Conservative
A	Fin	Donnelly	NDP
*	Earl	Dreeshen	Conservative
*	Francis	Drouin	Liberal
NO	Matthew	Dubé	NDP
A	Emmanuel	Dubourg	Liberal
*	Jean-Yves	Duclos	Liberal
*	Terry	Duguid	Liberal
*	Kirsty	Duncan	Liberal
NO	Linda	Duncan	NDP
NO	Pierre-Luc	Dusseault	NDP
NO	Scott	Duvall	NDP
*	Julie	Dzerowicz	Liberal
*	Wayne	Easter	Liberal
*	Jim	Eglinski	Conservative
*	Ali	Ehsassi	Liberal
A	Fayçal	El-Khoury	Liberal
*	Neil	Ellis	Liberal
A	Nathaniel	Erskine-Smith	Liberal
*	Mark	Eyking	Liberal
*	Doug	Eyolfson	Liberal
*	Ted	Falk	Conservative
*	Ed	Fast	Conservative
*	Greg	Fergus	Liberal
*	Andy	Fillmore	Liberal
*	Diane	Finley	Conservative
*	Pat	Finnigan	Liberal
*	Darren	Fisher	Liberal
A	Peter	Fonseca	Liberal
*	Judy	Foote	Liberal
NO	Rhéal	Fortin	Bloc Québécois
*	Peter	Fragiskatos	Liberal
*	Colin	Fraser	Liberal
A	Sean	Fraser	Liberal
*	Chrystia	Freeland	Liberal
*	Hedy	Fry	Liberal
A	Stephen	Fuhr	Liberal
*	Cheryl	Gallant	Conservative
*	Marc	Garneau	Liberal
NO	Randall	Garrison	NDP
*	Bernard	Généreux	Conservative
*	Garnett	Genuis	Conservative
*	Mark	Gerretsen	Liberal
NO	Marilène	Gill	Bloc Québécois
*	Marilyn	Gladu	Conservative
*	Joël	Godin	Conservative
*	Pam	Goldsmith-Jones	Liberal
*	Ralph	Goodale	Liberal
*	Karina	Gould	Liberal
*	Jacques	Gourde	Conservative
*	David	Graham	Liberal
*	Raj	Grewal	Liberal
*	Patty	Hajdu	Liberal
NO	Cheryl	Hardcastle	NDP
*	Rachael	Harder	Conservative
*	Ken	Hardie	Liberal
*	Stephen	Harper	Conservative
*	T.J.	Harvey	Liberal
*	Kent	Hehr	Liberal
A	Jim	Hillyer	Conservative
A	Randy	Hoback	Conservative
A	Mark	Holland	Liberal
*	Anthony	Housefather	Liberal
NO	Carol	Hughes	NDP
A	Ahmed	Hussen	Liberal
*	Gudie	Hutchings	Liberal
*	Angelo	Iacono	Liberal
*	Matt	Jeneroux	Conservative
NO	Gord	Johns	NDP
NO	Georgina	Jolibois	NDP
*	Mélanie	Joly	Liberal
*	Yvonne	Jones	Liberal
*	Bernadette	Jordan	Liberal
A	Majid	Jowhari	Liberal
NO	Peter	Julian	NDP
A	Darshan Singh	Kang	Liberal
*	Pat	Kelly	Conservative
A	Jason	Kenney	Conservative
*	Peter	Kent	Conservative
A	Iqra	Khalid	Liberal
A	Kamal	Khera	Liberal
*	Robert	Kitchen	Conservative
*	Tom	Kmiec	Conservative
NO	Jenny	Kwan	NDP
*	Mike	Lake	Conservative
*	David	Lametti	Liberal
*	Kevin	Lamoureux	Liberal
*	Linda	Lapointe	Liberal
*	Guy	Lauzon	Conservative
*	Stéphane	Lauzon	Liberal
NO	Hélène	Laverdière	NDP
A	Denis	Lebel	Conservative
*	Dominic	LeBlanc	Liberal
*	Diane	Lebouthillier	Liberal
*	Paul	Lefebvre	Liberal
*	K. Kellie	Leitch	Conservative
*	Denis	Lemieux	Liberal
*	Andrew	Leslie	Liberal
*	Michael	Levitt	Liberal
*	Ron	Liepert	Conservative
A	Joël	Lightbound	Liberal
*	Ben	Lobb	Conservative
*	Alaina	Lockhart	Liberal
*	Wayne	Long	Liberal
A	Lloyd	Longfield	Liberal
*	Karen	Ludwig	Liberal
*	Tom	Lukiwski	Conservative
*	Lawrence	MacAulay	Liberal
NO	Alistair	MacGregor	NDP
*	Dave	MacKenzie	Conservative
*	Steven	MacKinnon	Liberal
*	Larry	Maguire	Conservative
NO	Sheila	Malcolmson	NDP
*	James	Maloney	Liberal
NO	Simon	Marcil	Bloc Québécois
NO	Brian	Masse	NDP
*	Rémi	Massé	Liberal
NO	Irene	Mathyssen	NDP
*	Bryan	May	Liberal
A	Elizabeth	May	Green Party
*	John	McCallum	Liberal
*	Kelly	McCauley	Conservative
*	Phil	McColeman	Conservative
A	Karen	McCrimmon	Liberal
*	Ken	McDonald	Liberal
A	David	McGuinty	Liberal
A	John	McKay	Liberal
A	Catherine	McKenna	Liberal
*	Ron	McKinnon	Liberal
*	Cathy	McLeod	Conservative
*	Michael	McLeod	Liberal
A	Alexandra	Mendès	Liberal
*	Marco	Mendicino	Liberal
*	MaryAnn	Mihychuk	Liberal
*	Larry	Miller	Conservative
*	Marc	Miller	Liberal
*	Maryam	Monsef	Liberal
NO	Christine	Moore	NDP
*	Bill	Morneau	Liberal
*	Robert	Morrissey	Liberal
NO	Thomas	Mulcair	NDP
*	Joyce	Murray	Liberal
NO	Pierre	Nantel	NDP
A	Eva	Nassif	Liberal
*	John	Nater	Conservative
*	Robert	Nault	Liberal
*	Rob	Nicholson	Conservative
*	Alexander	Nuttall	Conservative
A	Deepak	Obhrai	Conservative
A	Jennifer	O'Connell	Liberal
*	Robert	Oliphant	Liberal
*	John	Oliver	Liberal
*	Seamus	O'Regan	Liberal
*	Erin	O'Toole	Conservative
*	Robert-Falcon	Ouellette	Liberal
*	Denis	Paradis	Liberal
*	Pierre	Paul-Hus	Conservative
A	Monique	Pauzé	Bloc Québécois
*	Joe	Peschisolido	Liberal
*	Kyle	Peterson	Liberal
*	Ginette	Petitpas Taylor	Liberal
*	Jane	Philpott	Liberal
*	Michel	Picard	Liberal
NO	Louis	Plamondon	Bloc Québécois
*	Pierre	Poilievre	Conservative
*	Jean-Claude	Poissant	Liberal
NO	Anne Minh-Thu	Quach	NDP
*	Carla	Qualtrough	Liberal
*	Lisa	Raitt	Conservative
NO	Tracey	Ramsey	NDP
NO	Murray	Rankin	NDP
A	Yasmin	Ratansi	Liberal
*	Alain	Rayes	Conservative
A	Geoff	Regan	Liberal
*	Scott	Reid	Conservative
*	Michelle	Rempel	Conservative
*	Blake	Richards	Conservative
*	Jean	Rioux	Liberal
*	Gerry	Ritz	Conservative
*	Yves	Robillard	Liberal
*	Pablo	Rodriguez	Liberal
*	Sherry	Romanado	Liberal
*	Anthony	Rota	Liberal
*	Kim	Rudd	Liberal
*	Dan	Ruimy	Liberal
A	Don	Rusnak	Liberal
NO	Romeo	Saganash	NDP
A	Ruby	Sahota	Liberal
*	Raj	Saini	Liberal
*	Harjit S.	Sajjan	Liberal
*	Darrell	Samson	Liberal
*	Ramesh	Sangha	Liberal
NO	Brigitte	Sansoucy	NDP
*	Randeep	Sarai	Liberal
*	Bob	Saroya	Conservative
*	Francis	Scarpaleggia	Liberal
*	Andrew	Scheer	Conservative
*	Peter	Schiefke	Liberal
*	Jamie	Schmale	Conservative
*	Deborah	Schulte	Liberal
*	Marc	Serré	Liberal
*	Judy	Sgro	Liberal
*	Brenda	Shanahan	Liberal
*	Terry	Sheehan	Liberal
*	Martin	Shields	Conservative
*	Bev	Shipley	Conservative
*	Jati	Sidhu	Liberal
*	Sonia	Sidhu	Liberal
*	Gagan	Sikand	Liberal
*	Scott	Simms	Liberal
A	Amarjeet	Sohi	Liberal
*	Robert	Sopuck	Conservative
*	Francesco	Sorbara	Liberal
*	Kevin	Sorenson	Conservative
A	Sven	Spengemann	Liberal
*	Bruce	Stanton	Conservative
A	Gabriel	Ste-Marie	Bloc Québécois
NO	Wayne	Stetski	NDP
NO	Kennedy	Stewart	NDP
*	Mark	Strahl	Conservative
*	Shannon	Stubbs	Conservative
*	David	Sweet	Conservative
A	Marwan	Tabbara	Liberal
A	Geng	Tan	Liberal
*	Filomena	Tassi	Liberal
NO	Luc	Thériault	Bloc Québécois
A	David	Tilson	Conservative
*	Hunter	Tootoo	Liberal
*	Brad	Trost	Conservative
*	Justin	Trudeau	Liberal
NO	Karine	Trudel	NDP
*	Dave	Van Kesteren	Conservative
*	Peter	Van Loan	Conservative
*	Dan	Vandal	Liberal
A	Anita	Vandenbeld	Liberal
*	Adam	Vaughan	Liberal
*	Karen	Vecchio	Conservative
*	Arnold	Viersen	Conservative
A	Arif	Virani	Liberal
*	Cathay	Wagantall	Conservative
*	Mark	Warawa	Conservative
*	Chris	Warkentin	Conservative
*	Dianne	Watts	Conservative
*	Kevin	Waugh	Conservative
*	Len	Webber	Conservative
NO	Erin	Weir	NDP
NO	Nick	Whalen	Liberal
*	Jonathan	Wilkinson	Liberal
*	Jody	Wilson-Raybould	Liberal
*	Alice	Wong	Conservative
*	Borys	Wrzesnewskyj	Liberal
A	Kate	Young	Liberal
*	David	Yurdiga	Conservative
A	Salma	Zahid	Liberal
*	Bob	Zimmer	Conservative